首页> 外文OA文献 >Audit Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Framework Cobit 4.1 (Studi Kasus Ibi Darmajaya)
【2h】

Audit Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Framework Cobit 4.1 (Studi Kasus Ibi Darmajaya)

机译:使用障碍框架4.1的学术信息系统审核(Ibi Darmajaya案例研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Academic Information System Management that is not managed properly will result in low quality of service, low levels of customer satisfaction / student, so it can affect the level of stakeholder confidence in the institutions. The foregoing can be addressed by monitoring / evaluation periodically the implementation SIAKAD. With the monitoring of the implementation process SIAKAD expected to improve any shortcomings and weaknesses of the current system become better and in accordance with business objectives institutions. Methods used are the stages of auditing information systems, namely : Planning, Fieldwork, Reporting, Follow-up. Tool use is Framework COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology) issued by ISACA (Information Systems Audit and Control Association). Based on the result of the calculation on any IT processes contained in the domain of Planning and Organization (PO) and Delivery and Support (DS) normally located at level 3 (defined process), so that the whole IT can achieve the level of desired doneness (expected maturity level) in level 4 (manage) then all procedures required in each process should be met. To achieve level 4 (manage) then each IT process must have a written standard procedures and communicated to all parties involved in the academic information system, that is to the managers and users of the system. Such procedures should be documented and updated periodically. From the results of the gap between the maturity level of IT governance is now at a level of maturity to be achieved, it is known in the domain PO and DS priority repairs done at the PO7 (managing IT human resources).
机译:管理不当的学术信息系统管理将导致服务质量下降,客户满意度/学生低水平,因此可能会影响利益相关者对机构的信心。可以通过定期监视/评估实施SIAKAD来解决上述问题。通过对实施过程的监控,SIAKAD有望改善并根据业务目标机构改善当前系统的任何不足和弱点。所使用的方法是审核信息系统的阶段,即:计划,实地考察,报告,跟进。工具的使用是ISACA(信息系统审计和控制协会)发布的Framework COBIT(信息和相关技术的控制目标)。基于通常位于第3级(定义的流程)的规划和组织(PO)以及交付和支持(DS)域中包含的任何IT流程的计算结果,因此整个IT部门都可以达到期望的水平完成(预期的成熟度)级别4(管理),则应满足每个过程所需的所有程序。为了达到第4级(管理),则每个IT流程都必须具有书面的标准程序,并与学术信息系统中涉及的所有各方,即与系统的管理者和用户进行沟通。此类程序应形成文件并定期更新。从IT治理的成熟度水平到现在要达到的成熟度水平之间的差距的结果来看,在PO7(管理IT人力资源)中完成PO和DS优先级修复领域是众所周知的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Purwati, Neni;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号